The IR calendar is time-stamped with the earnings call. From a “content marketing” perspective, earnings calls are very rich. Unfortunately, they are rich in pressure too. It’s almost as if the other 361 days don’t exist.
Certainly the pressure is really about the results themselves, but the tactical aspects (and execution) of the telephony and webcast are all too real to IR: scripting, preparing visuals, media alerts, scheduling, CEO and staff verbal tenor, phone quality, Q&A management… even the detail of the operator pronouncing names correctly.
Is it worth it? As you’ll see below, yes.
Plus, the retail investors that reported they listen to earnings’ webcasts increased 5% from the first time we asked.
Click here to request the complete Shareholder Confidence 365 Study.
About the study
Initially launched in 2012, the Shareholder Confidence 365 Study is an ongoing survey targeted at two key constituents with whom public companies communicate: institutional investors and individual investors. It was the first study of its kind — directly asking investors how they consume investor relations content. In 2014, we published an updated study.
For this 2016 iteration, we have segmented and compared the results between institutional investors and individual investors. To date. we have accumulated over 6,870 responses from a pool of 16,000 buy-side analysts & portfolio managers and from over 15,000 long-term holding retail investors. There are 29 questions.
- How often do you visit IR websites?
- Why do you visit IR websites?
- Do you use Twitter for stock research?
- Would a CEO video instill trust?
- Do you use earnings estimates?
The inbound response ratio is 1:3, Wall Street to Main Street. All of the data is unedited, except for any typos within the comments and the exclusion of inappropriate comments.