Whitepaper illustrates the simple difference between traditional IPOs and confidential IPOs

Click the image to download the whitepaper

Click the image to download the whitepaper

When Twitter announced their confidential IPO last year, many pundits took this as a negative move. “Something is up over there…” Bah. As blogged here, the word “cautious” is a better word to describe the motives of the confidential IPO process.

What is a confidential IPO? The JOBS Act allows firms with less than $1 billion in annual revenue (emerging-growth companies or EGCs) to keep their IPO filings confidential up until just three weeks before they roadshow and market their shares. This is in contrast to the typical S-1 file which is openly filed months before the roadshow giving potential investors, media, peers and competitors a longer time window to consider an investment.

So the questions are… what are investors missing? Is there material information they are not seeing? What is held confidential? What is the SEC doing? Are investors going to “get screwed” from this clock-and-dagger filing?

  • No information is held back from potential investors.
  • The SEC is doing the exact same work they always do with a “traditional” S-1 (IPO) filing.

As you will read in the whitepaper, the single workflow difference is when the S-1 file is released to the public. The confidential IPO process only alters the timeline of the S-1 disclosure, not the material information within the S-1. Traditional or confidential IPO – the same amount of information is disclosed. 

Why file confidential? The confidential filing gives EGCs some elbow room to discover different options to access required capital… including a public offering, a complete sale or some other capital-raising path. The confidential option is very useful for companies in a market that is demonstrating shorter pricing windows due to volatility. They can begin the regulatory review process quietly and if “The Market” environment becomes unfavorable, they can peacefully stop the process without facing any market backlash for “pulling their IPO.”

Lastly, in situations like Twitter perhaps, a confidential filing lessons the intense media spotlight – allowing the executive team to focus.


Vintage Filings has worked with hundreds of companies for their transactions. Here is one of our confidential IPO clients interviewed in Forbes.

Download the whitepaper here.

Have a great day.

5 responses to “Whitepaper illustrates the simple difference between traditional IPOs and confidential IPOs

  1. Reblogged this on Beyond PR and commented:
    Our colleagues on the IR side of the house issued a new white paper yesterday. If you are involved (or interested) in the IPO process, this paper will shed some light on a the differences between traditional IPOs and confidential IPOs.

  2. Pingback: Dammit, how many times do I have to tell you? It’s a Cautious IPO, not stealth or secret | Building Shareholder Confidence

  3. Pingback: How long is the Confidential IPOs and SEC ping-pong match? 74 days | Building Shareholder Confidence

  4. Pingback: DIY an S-1 filing? Brides should not bake their own wedding cake. | Building Shareholder Confidence

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s